|
|
November 01
I heard on a British TV show that the European Union
wants to move the “Green” revolution to its Military. They are preparing to
introduce legislation that will force military vehicles to reduce their
emissions and to adhere to the existing laws that already apply to commercial
cars, boats and planes. This will mean that the CO2 footprint will be reduced. So we will have
cleaner exhaust fumes at the end, while shooting with depleted uranium shells
at the front. It must be a great comfort to the enemy that they now will be
killed by machines with much improved emissions
October 12
Since your organization is a
politically appointed entity, and since the government is elected by the people
of this country, then technically speaking you are responsible at all times to
give information to the electorate. Furthermore, as I am a member of the
electing body, I am qualified to receive such reports. If you feel that this is
arrogance on my part, then you may feel that way. I don’t really care if you
feel that way or not. Whatever your feelings on the subject may be, your
establishment owes explanations to me, or any voter who asks for it.
As it happens I have been living abroad
for several decades, and ever since my return four years ago I first observed
the workings of your centre for equality and opposition to racism, I must
confess that from my point of view your association is firstly a costly white
elephant (pardon the pun), and secondly a biased waste of time and resources.
Biased towards the original population of this country. Frivolous lawsuits
against the indigenous people based on some second hand info or the “say-so” of
some person or group. Those lawsuits always are extensively milked in the
various media. Is this perhaps to appear to be busy and to justify the
ridiculous funds you receive?
It is a fact that I must yet hear about
or observe the first court case you would set in motion against a person or
group with roots outside this country for discriminating against a native. Am I
therefore to assume that only white people can be racist? One of your
foundation’s legal statements calls for “…respect for the basic rights of
foreigners” What
about the rights of our own population? Nowhere did I read anything about the
basic DUTIES of foreigners. I guess they only have rights and nothing else.
Reading further in the legalese language of your document nowhere is it stated
that your “personnel at the
Centre actively intervene and provide practical support to the victims” if
those same victims happen to be of white extraction. This creates the
impression that this section of the population can never be victims but only
perpetrators.
There are areas in Belgium which have
become no-go zones for us indigenous people. I feel discriminated. Can I rely
on your personnel to pursue this with the utmost urgency? Daily I hear about
illegal immigrants being housed in hotels at taxpayer’s expense while my mother
who worked her whole life can hardly afford anything on the pathetic pension
she’s being paid. This is also discrimination. Where was the centre when she
was mugged by these same foreigners with rights but no duties? Where was the
centre when in March a woman was murdered in a robbery by these people full of
rights? But of course this is not politically correct is it?
Don't
let anyone fool you that political correctness is just about being "nice
to people", tolerant and treating them with proper respect. That's called
good manners. Political correctness has been deliberately designed to subvert
free speech, debate and common sense, replacing these with a ruthlessly
enforced set of left wing ideas. Far from being tolerant, politically correct
people are the most intolerant of all people and have the worst manners. They
refuse to debate subjects (as their views don't stand up to the most elementary
scrutiny), preferring just to scream abuse at you.
Should
you question whether unfettered immigration into this country is necessarily a
good thing or perhaps whether immigrants should be health checked, then you
must be a nasty bigoted person. Political correctness is perpetrated by the
left in politics as a cover for their flawed ideology - a sort of cultural
Marxism. By cloaking their strange ideas under the cover of not wishing to
offend anyone (which naturally appeals to peoples' better nature), they try to
bypass debate and give a 'received wisdom' which must not be questioned. And
anyone who disagrees with this 'received wisdom' must therefore be a really
nasty person and deserves to be ostracized by their peers. This peer pressure
is instrumental in enforcing and expanding political correctness. This reeks of
despotism and megalomania.
I
see that you are prosecuting anyone with Nazi sympathies, and are against anti-Semitism.
Good for you. But why not go a bit further? Why don’t we also outlaw anything
to do with Communism since Russia and China were also responsible for as many
if not more deaths as Nazi Germany? Let’s ban T shirts with Che Guevara on it,
or Stalin, or Mao. Let’s also ban any literature to do with those repressive
regimes. After all, why just stop at only the Nazi regime? Oh I forgot, they
were anti Semitic. That’s right. I suppose Russia wasn’t, or the Arab world?
This should keep you busy with litigation well into the next century wouldn’t
you say?
You
guys love the term “multiculturalism”. I don’t need another culture thank you
very much. I am happy with the one I have. Of course you claim that this will
enrich my perspective. Still, of the so called cultures and religions that are
being imported here I want no part of. Why would I need to accept a new
religion that is preaching a return to standards that we have left behind
hundreds of years ago? I prefer the works of Shakespeare or Goethe, the works
of Leonardo or Vermeer, the technological progression of my own culture. You
may keep the others. I
am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of
civilians, cowardly attacks on
public buildings, suicide murders, the murder of film directors in Holland , and the rioting and looting in Paris
and Brussels. That is what
offends me. If some do not like the values of the West
maybe you can help and educate them about our rights as well. Of course they are free to leave if that is not too much to
ask of them.
Illegal
immigrants (if caught) are rarely deported. Those that are deported are just
the more honest ones who don't know how to play the system or haven't been
coached by the likes of you! Oh and have you got a long way to come to get
here? Why not hijack an airliner for the trip? Don't worry; we will still let
you stay! I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized,
and does not entitle you to anything. Get over it! I also think the cops have
the right to pull you over if you're breaking the law, regardless of what color
you are. I am convinced 'illegal' is illegal no matter what the lawyers think.
I feel discriminated against because you appointed yourself
judge, jury and executioner over whom I have to accept as friend or am willing
to associate with, of what I can or cannot think or share, and how to live my
life. In any case, I do as I please.
I presume hereby that in view of your
insistence on multiculturalism you understand English.
August 25 To: Mr. André Vanhaeverbeke, Chairman, Belgian Section, Association Internationale des Anciens des Communautés Européennes
Dear Sir,
For nearly three decades I have lived abroad. Away from the country of my birth. I was born in Flanders, and now for the past 3,5 years I have returned here. All this time I was unable to use the language of my birth and it is not surprising therefore that I write to you in English as it is best suited to express myself.
By chance I read through your publication (Nr 47) in which you defend the wearing of the headscarf, the Chador, and even the Burka in our Western Society. Furthermore, you echo the writings of our former (luckily) minister of culture earlier this year where you seem to, like him, have no tolerance for your own countrymen and women who seem to abhor this symbol of a foreign culture. Not only that, but you naively suggest we should accept this in the hope that Muslim girls will eventually get rid of this voluntarily. Sir, either you are really that naïve, or, what’s more likely, you just repeat parrot fashion the leftist nature of the European community who over the years has forced this so called multi cultural society on us. After all, why bite the hand that feeds you? Since this is more or less the same argument I had with our former minister, I shall incorporate some parts of my previous writings. Unlike you I do know what I am talking about when I touched on the subject of our culture being overrun by this backward and anachronistic religion and its rules. Of the thirty years I was away I have lived sixteen of those years in a predominantly Islamic neighborhood. This is not to say I am an expert, far from it, however I do think it qualifies me to talk about this.
“Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a vehicle for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well. As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world. “ (Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat)
The veiled woman has over the years become a symbol of Islamic self-assertion and a rejection of Western cultural hegemony. The issue of the veil has been hijacked to a degree by cultural essentialists. For Islamists rejection of Western modes of dress is not enough. Resistance and independence can only be demonstrated by wholesale affirmation of their culture. An American magazine (The Weekly Standard) did a survey in France (May 2003) and reported that it found that 77% of girls wearing the hijab did so because of physical threats. Muslim women in India, Iraq and other countries have been attacked and even killed for not adhering to strict Islamic dress code. So I ask you, if they reject our Western norms, why not let them depart to places where this dress code is fashion? Why reject our Western values, but not our medical care system, our unemployment benefits, our welfare system? Why not go a step further and do away with all Western stuff such as cell phones, cars, Ipods, TV, Radio, and go back to their religion in its purest form? Or is that too much to ask maybe?
Basically you are telling us Europeans are selfish and afraid of the unknown religions that swamp our country. In particular Islam. Why shouldn’t we be? It has taken us centuries to get where we want to be and in those centuries we finally have freed ourselves from the yoke of organized religion and have moved on with great strides because of it. Now you want us to accept that another religion comes over here and as guests force us, the host country, to accept a backwards and dangerous theocracy. This religion is the greatest danger the western world has ever faced and if unchecked will force their outdated worldviews on us. Does it not worry you that they call our women whores when they dress in ways Islam does not accept? Is it not OUR country? Does it not worry you that most violent protests are perpetrated by this section of citizens? Do you not see that they have nothing but contempt for our laws, for our lifestyle, for our culture? Or would you rather roll over and surrender to a foreign influence which is trying to make sure that the western world will be dragged back into the middle ages? And this time, it will take a lot longer to climb out from that abyss. The European Union has ensured that people have become second class citizens in their own countries by threatening with fines and jail terms anyone who speaks out against this state of affairs. People are afraid to be branded racists because they disagree with this section of the population. This multicultural society you praise so highly and try to force on us is an abject failure. Why are Belgians called before a court if they mistreat their spouses but not them? Why is it accepted that they can get away with the unequal treatment of women while it clearly states in our laws that this is forbidden? Why are they allowed to chant Anti Jewish and Anti Christian Slogans without fear of prosecution, while if one of our own is even suspected of harboring such thoughts is hauled before court so fast his feet won’t even touch the ground? All they have to do is yell “Discrimination!” and governments piss their pants.
Unlike you and your colleagues I have been on the front line in the struggle against terrorism. Unlike you I have seen first-hand what fundamentalists do to those they consider “Kafir” (unbelievers). Unlike you I paid my dues in blood, sweat, and tears. And maybe unlike you I do have a Qur’an at home. This book has 114 chapters named Surahs and are not in chronological order but according to length. Many verses are contradicting themselves, so according to Surah 2:106 only the later verses are valid. i.e. Surah 9 is extremely violent and will render all previous peaceful passages null and void.
Muslims may never question or doubt the Qur’an (Surah 2:1) Muslims may not have as friends anyone from a different faith (Surah 5:51) “O, you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as your friends and protectors… It is the task of Muslims to kill non-Muslims (Surah 9:5) …then fight and slay the Pagans wherever you find them, and seize them, and beleaguer them and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)…. It is ok to terrorize non-believers (Surah 8:12) Muslims are required to lie to non-believers to help Islam (Surah 3:28 & 16:106). Non-believers have 3 options: a) they can die, b) they convert to Islam & c) Pay Jizya (religious tax) so they will be left alive (Surah 9:29). Non-Muslims are bad people who deserve no mercy (Surah 98:6). Corporal punishment for women is allowed (Surah 4:34). If a woman has been raped she will need 4 male witnesses as proof. (Surah 24:13). The whole of chapter 8 is called “The spoils of war” and deals with the fact that robbery and theft from non-believers is a good deed. Marrying an underage child is allowed (Surah 65:4) Even Mohammed did so. He was 51 when he married Aisha who was 6 at the time. At 54 (when she was 9) he consummated the marriage. There is evidence that the number of Islamic child brides in Europe and England is increasing. Shariah courts and law are now officially recognized in cities across England, even as domestic abuse of Islamic women increases. There are reports that estimate there are now between 50,000 and 100,000 polygamous Muslim marriages in the U.S.
As Europe and England have learned, radical Islamists have a different definition of “co-existing” than we do. “Co-existing” ultimately means our values; traditions and practices must give way to theirs.
Don't let anyone fool you that political correctness is just about being "nice to people", tolerant and treating them with proper respect. That's called good manners. Political correctness has been deliberately designed to subvert free speech, debate and common sense, replacing these with a ruthlessly enforced set of left wing ideas. Far from being tolerant, politically correct people are the most intolerant of all people and have the worst manners. They refuse to debate subjects (as their views don't stand up to the most elementary scrutiny), preferring just to scream abuse at you. Should you question whether unfettered immigration into this country is necessarily a good thing or perhaps whether immigrants should be health checked, then you must be a nasty bigoted person.
So as you can see, I happen to disagree with your perspective.
July 01
Yankton, South Dakota: A woman was arrested at her step son's Boy Scout meeting. While watching a policeman demonstrate his drug dog's ability, the dog found a bag of grass in her purse.
Colorado Springs: A guy walked into a little corner store with a shotgun and demanded all the cash from the cash drawer. After the cashier put the cash in a bag, the robber saw a bottle of scotch that he wanted behind the counter on the shelf.
He told the cashier to put it in the bag as well, but he refused and said "Because I don't believe you are over 21."
The robber said he was, but the clerk still refused to give it to him because he didn't believe him. At this point the robber took his driver’s license out of his wallet and gave it to the clerk. The clerk looked it over, and agreed that the man was in fact over 21 and he put the scotch in the bag. The robber then ran from the store with his loot.
The cashier promptly called the police and gave the name and address of the robber that he got off the license. They arrested the robber two hours later.
A woman was reporting her car as stolen and mentioned that there was a car phone in it. The policeman taking the report called the phone and told the guy that answered that he had read the ad in the newspaper and wanted to buy the car. They arranged to meet, and the thief was arrested.
San Francisco: A man, wanting to rob a downtown Bank of America, walked into the branch and wrote "this iz a stikkup.Put all your muny in this bag."
While standing in line, waiting to give his note to the teller, he began to worry that someone had seen him write the note and might call the police before he reached the teller window. So he left the Bank of America and crossed the street to Wells Fargo.
After waiting a few minutes in line, he handed his note to the Wells Fargo teller. She read it and, surmising from his spelling errors that he was not the brightest light in the harbor, told him that she could not accept his stickup note because it was written on a Bank of America deposit slip and that he would either have to fill out a Wells Fargo deposit slip or go back to Bank of America. Looking somewhat defeated, the man said "OK" and left.
The Wells Fargo teller then called the police who arrested the man a few minutes later, as he was waiting in line back at Bank of America.
From England: A motorist was unknowingly caught in an automated speed trap that measured his speed using radar and photographed his car.
He later received in the mail a ticket for 40 Pounds and a photo of his car. Instead of payment, he sent the police department a photograph of 40 Pounds. Several days later, he received a letter from the police that contained another picture...of handcuffs. The motorist promptly sent the money for the fine.
Drug Possession Defendant Christopher Jansen, on trial in March in Pontiac, Michigan, said he had been searched without a warrant. The prosecutor said the officer didn't need a warrant because a "bulge" in Christopher's jacket could have been a gun.
"Nonsense," said Christopher, who happened to be wearing the same jacket that day in court. He handed it over so the judge could see it. The judge discovered a packet of cocaine in the pocket and laughed so hard he required a five minute recess to compose himself.
Oklahoma City: Dennis Newton was on trial for the armed robbery of a convenience store in district court when he fired his lawyer. Assistant district attorney Larry Jones said Newton, 47, was doing a fair job of defending himself until the store manager testified that Newton was the
robber. Newton jumped up, accused the woman of lying and then said, "I should have blown your fucking head off." The defendant paused, then quickly added, "If I'd been the one that was there." The jury took 20 minutes to convict Newton and recommended a 30-year sentence.
Detroit: R.C. Gaitlan, 21, walked up to two patrol officers who were showing their squad car computer felon-location equipment to children in a Detroit neighborhood. When he asked how the system worked, the officer asked him for identification. Gaitlan gave them his driver’s license, they entered it into the computer, and moments later they arrested Gaitlan because information on the screen showed Gaitlan was wanted for a two-year-old armed robbery in St. Louis, Missouri.
Another from Detroit: A pair of Michigan robbers entered a record shop nervously waving revolvers. The first one shouted, "Nobody move!" When his partner moved, the startled first bandit shot him.
THE WINNER
A Charlotte, NC, man having purchased a case of very rare, very expensive cigars insured them against fire among other things. Within a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of cigars and without having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the man filed a claim
against the insurance company. In his claim, the man stated the cigars were lost "in a series of small fires." The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion. The man sued.... and won. In delivering the ruling
the judge agreeing that the claim was frivolous, stated nevertheless that the man held a policy from the company in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure against fire, without defining what it considered to be “unacceptable fire," and was obligated to pay the claim. Rather than endure a lengthy and costly appeal process the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid the man $15,000 for the rare cigars he lost in "the fires." After the man cashed the check, however, the company had him arrested on 24 counts of arson. With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the man was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.
June 29
Rule One:
If you pull into my driveway and honk you'd better be delivering a package, because you're sure not picking anything up.
Rule Two:
You do not touch my daughter in front of me. You may glance at her, so long as you do not peer at anything below her neck. If you cannot keep your eyes or hands off of my daughter's body, I will remove them.
Rule Three:
I am aware that it is considered fashionable for boys of your age to wear their trousers so loosely that they appear to be falling off their hips. Please don't take this as an insult, but you and all of your friends are complete idiots. Still, I want to be fair and open minded about this issue, so I propose this compromise: You may come to the door with your underwear showing and your pants ten sizes too big, and I will not object. However, in order to ensure that your clothes do not, in fact, come off during the course of your date with my daughter, I will take my electric nail gun and fasten your trousers securely in place to your waist.
Rule Four:
I'm sure you've been told that in today's world, sex without utilizing a "barrier method" of some kind can kill you. Let me elaborate, when it comes to sex, I am the barrier, and I will kill you.
Rule Five:
It is usually understood that in order for us to get to know each other, we should talk about sports, politics, and other issues of the day. Please do not do this. The only information I require from you is an indication of when you expect to have my daughter safely back at my house, and the only word I need from you on this subject is "early."
Rule Six:
I have no doubt you are a popular fellow, with many opportunities to date other girls. This is fine with me as long as it is okay with my daughter. Otherwise, once you have gone out with my little girl, you will continue to date no one but her until she is finished with you. If you make her cry, I will make you cry.
Rule Seven:
As you stand in my front hallway, waiting for my daughter to appear, and more than an hour goes by, do not sigh and fidget. If you want to be on time for the movie, you should not be dating. My daughter is putting on her makeup, a process that can take longer than painting the Golden Gate Bridge. Instead of just standing there, why don't you do something useful, like changing the oil in my car?
Rule Eight:
The following places are not appropriate for a date with my daughter:
Places where there are beds, sofas, or anything softer than a wooden stool.
Places where there are no parents, policemen, or nuns within eyesight.
Places where there is darkness. Places where there is dancing, holding hands, or happiness. Places where the ambient temperature is warm enough to induce my daughter to wear shorts, tank tops, midriff T-shirts, or anything other than overalls, a sweater, and a goose down parka - zipped up to her throat. Movies with a strong romantic or sexual theme are to be avoided; movies which features chain saws are okay. Hockey games are okay. Old folks homes are better.
Rule Nine:
Do not lie to me. I may appear to be a potbellied, middle-aged, dimwitted has-been. But on issues relating to my daughter, I am the all-knowing, merciless god of your universe. If I ask you where you are going and with whom, you have one chance to tell me the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. I have a shotgun, a shovel, and five acres behind the house. Do not trifle with me.
Rule Ten:
Be afraid. Be very afraid. It takes very little for me to mistake the sound of your car in the driveway for a chopper coming in over a rice paddy near Hanoi. When my Agent Orange starts acting up, the voices in my head frequently tell me to clean the guns as I wait for you to bring my daughter home. As soon as you pull into the driveway you should exit your car with both hands in plain sight. Speak the perimeter password, announce in a clear voice that you have brought my daughter home safely and early, then return to your car - there is no need for you to come inside. The camouflaged face at the window is mine.
June 27
When his .38-calibre revolver failed to fire at its intended victim during a hold-up in Long Beach, California, robber James Elliot did something that can only inspire wonder: he peered down the barrel and tried the trigger
again. Happily for most concerned, this time it worked.
The chef at a hotel in Switzerland lost a finger in a meat-cutting machine and, after a little peremptory hopping around, submitted a claim to his insurance company. The company, suspecting negligence, sent out one of its
men to have a look. He tried the machine out and lost a finger. The chef's claim was approved.
Surprised while burgling a house in Antwerp, Belgium, a thief fled out the back door, clambered over a nine-foot wall, dropped down the other side, and found himself in the city prison.
In Bermuda in 1975 a man on a motor scooter was knocked down and killed by a taxi. Exactly a year earlier the same driver in the same taxi, carrying the same passenger, had knocked down and killed the motor-scooter rider's brother, on the same street, riding the same scooter.
An American tourist in South America had the decidedly grave misfortune to be attacked by Killer bees as he stood on the bank of the Amazon. Seeking refuge, he leaped into the river and was devoured by piranha fish.
A Malaysian monkey that had been trained to gather coconuts from trees demonstrated a pressing need for a refresher course when it leaped onto the shoulders of a passer-by in Kuala Lumpur and tried to twist his head off. The passer-by was treated at a local hospital for a sprained neck.
In Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a sixteen-year-old youth was charged with beating up his fifteen-year-old wife after the latter hid the caps to his toy pistol.
A man who shovelled snow for an hour to clear a space for his car during a blizzard in Chicago returned with his vehicle to find a woman had taken the space. Understandably, he shot her dead.
After shooting and wounding his wife and young son, Louis Pilar of Rheims, France, told police that a three-week strike by television technicians was to blame. 'There was nothing to look at,' he explained, 'and I was bored.
Fortunately his wife did not seem to mind being shot at. From her hospital bed she said: 'I don't blame my husband. It really was very boring in the evenings.' May 03
Islam
Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.
Here's how it works.
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
United States -- Muslim 0.6%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1.8%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 15%
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%
Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'
It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.
Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat
April 22
April 22nd, 2009
Minister Anciaux
I read your recent interview in a popular weekly magazine.
I quote: “The more people critisize me the less they will beat their wives”
You arogant bastard, you slimy piece of shit. How dare you compare people who critisize you with wife beaters? I challenge you to come and say that to my face you ball-less pathetic excuse of a man.
Go ahead asshole, come and say it to my face if you have the guts. You think you can just say anything you want because you are protected as a minister?
Come on then asshole, come and get me. You know I am not hiding.
Dirk Vermeulen
PS this will be going around the world via the net April 17 Have you ever stopped to wonder why 40% of people don't bother to vote anymore? Have you ever stopped to wonder why, which ever party is in power, nothing ever gets any better? Have you ever stopped to wonder why all the major political parties in the EU have broadly the same policies? The answer is simple - political correctness. This left wing ideology has very cleverly, and by stealth, replaced politics. The PC Brigade effectively hold a gun to the head of political parties - none of the main parties now dare suggest any policy that is not politically correct otherwise the PC Brigade will label them the 'nasty' party.
So we now have the main parties all occupying the same small piece of 'centre ground'. Many people don't vote on the grounds that it is pointless - you will get the same whoever wins. Some people don't vote because they realize that politically correct policies are what has got us into this mess in the first place.
Other people don't vote because they realize that career politicians are a self seeking, corrupt bunch of freeloaders who they wouldn't trust to run a fuck in a whorehouse. Notice that I say career politicians - this is the new breed of politicians that haven't ever entered the real world of work. They have left school, gone to university and then bagged a job as a 'research assistant' to a MP before realizing that with most of our laws now made abroad, the job was such a well paid doddle that they could do it themselves. They have never had to hold down a proper job, they have no management or other skills, hold no real political views and tend to migrate to whichever party looks most likely to win power. To survive in this fantasy environment all you need to do is to be politically correct.
So what is political correctness, how did it start and how did it become so successful? Political correctness is first and foremost an attack on free speech, clear thinking and discussion. Political correctness is perpetrated by the left in politics as a cover for their flawed ideology - a sort of cultural Marxism. By cloaking their strange ideas under the cover of not wishing to offend anyone (which naturally appeals to peoples' better nature), they try to bypass debate and give a 'received wisdom' which must not be questioned. And anyone who disagrees with this 'received wisdom' must therefore be a really nasty person and deserves to be ostracised by their peers. This peer pressure is instrumental in enforcing and expanding political correctness.
For example, if you question whether unfettered immigration into this country is necessarily a good thing or perhaps whether immigrants should be health checked, then you must be a nasty bigoted 'Little Cunt'. Come on everyone - shout him down with cries of 'racist'. Of course, only the hard of thinking could be drawn into this charade - anyone with an ounce of common sense can see right through it.
So how did it all start? Political Correctness started in a think tank (called The Frankfurt School) in Germany in 1923. The purpose was to find a solution to the biggest problem facing the implementers of communism in Russia. Why wasn't the wonderful idea of communism spreading?.
The Frankfurt school recommended (amongst other things):
- the creation of racism offences
- continual change to create confusion
- the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
- the undermining of schools and teachers' authority
- huge immigration to destroy national identity
- the promotion of excessive drinking
- emptying the churches
- an unreliable legal system with bias against the victim of crime
- dependency on the state or state benefits
- control and dumbing down of media
- encouraging the breakdown of the family
Sound all too familiar?
The basic idea is to make the country wholly dependent on the State. By the dumbing down of education, the creation of huge state sector employment and large scale immigration, New Left has effectively created a captive audience to vote for them.
If the Conservative minded did get back into power, nothing much would change. But of course, political correctness has made common sense a thing of the past. If you catch a burglar in your house then it's probably best to help the poor soul by carrying your possessions to the front door lest he should trip up and hurt himself and it's you that end up in court!
After all, you won't get much help from the Police, who have been effectively neutralized by the fast tracking of university graduates whose only experience of life has been obtained in the liberal atmosphere of education. Probably best not to complain to them about their lack of attendance when your car has been vandalized or you will probably get a letter back from a Superintendent pointing out that vandals are victims as well. And just in case any real policemen still exist, the Politically Correct Brigade has turned the Police Force in on itself by claims of institutional racism.
If they do actually succeed in getting a villain into court (only 1 for every 100 crimes committed) then the Magistrates hand out such lenient sentences (as laid down by the very Politically Correct 'sentencing advisory panel') that there is no deterrent. If you do end up in prison (extremely unlikely as New Left have deliberately refused to build anything like enough new places) the prison officers are told to call you by your first name and not say anything that may upset you! As your cell is now your home, you are allowed to smoke there but Prison Officers who want to search it for drugs now have to give you 30 mins notice of their visit so that they don't put themselves at risk from the smoke oh and also to give you enough time to move your drugs elsewhere. Just in case you do get bored, you can keep yourself amused by repeatedly taking the prison governor to court over trivial matters that you think violate your human rights (no pornography etc) - all paid for by legal aid!
Travellers can descend upon your area, dump old cars and shit everywhere with impunity. You try doing it in your front garden and see what happens! They are allowed to bypass the normal planning controls that are so strictly enforced on the rest of us and cost local councils hundreds of thousands in court cases and clean-ups. Who pays? Why you do of course - just check your council tax bill!
Illegal immigrants (if caught) are rarely deported. Those that are deported are just the more honest ones who don't know how to play the system or haven't been coached by the National Coalition of Anti-Deportation Campaigns which is funded by your lottery money! Oh and have you got a long way to come to get here? Why not hijack an airliner for the trip? Don't worry, we will still let you stay!
Would you like a black coffee? NO! You can't say that! It's coffee without milk and Local Authorities spend a fortune of our money on making their employees attend courses on Newspeak and Diversity training!
Humor has suffered badly. We can't tell jokes anymore in case it's considered racist or it upsets anyone. Don't these Politically Correct people realize that the clue is in the word "joke", which my dictionary quite rightly defines as "something said in fun or jest" or "to say something in fun or teasing rather than in earnest?"
Try organizing an event or trip and you find yourself tied up in the endless red tape created by the Health & Safety Executive. These people are all part of the 'Nanny State' (state control) which insists in sticking its nose into every aspect of our lives and telling us how to live it!
Just in case there is anyone left in the country that might still be enjoying themselves - let's ban smoking, fox hunting and let feminists launch a totally unfounded attack on men as rapists.
That is the sad state of the EU today. But overwhelmed by their own success with political correctness, the left have something else just as sinister up their sleeve so they can expand their power and control over us even more - the Great Global Warming scam! Same methodology - an idea to appeal to peoples' better nature - let's save the planet - and the same way of enforcing it by peer pressure. Just watch what happens to any scientist who breaks ranks or disagrees - they get the same treatment that Galileo got from the medieval church. Politically correct people can't stand reality or see that things have evolved to be as they are for good reasons. Politically correct people remind me of ostriches - they bury their heads in the sand and then proceed to talk out of the only orifice that still remains above ground.
So don't let anyone fool you that political correctness is just about being "nice to people", tolerant and treating them with proper respect. That's called good manners. Political correctness has been deliberately designed to subvert free speech, debate and common sense, replacing these with a ruthlessly enforced set of left wing ideas. Far from being tolerant, politically correct people are the most intolerant of all people and have the worst manners. They refuse to debate subjects (as their views don't stand up to the most elementary scrutiny), preferring just to scream abuse at you.
For those politically correct idiots who object to this blog GO FUCK YOURSELVES!!!!!!!!
Sources: The Internet, The American Thinker, PC - The awful truth, and myself
March 01
Dear mister Vermeulen,
Thank you for you e-mail.
I don't agree with you: I respect every person, whether he believes or not. It's a private matter. But I won't accept any kind of violence, no one should be surpressed.
Yes, as minister of Culture I want to preserve the inheritance of our forefathers, therefore we have 'het Topstukkendecreet' and there are all kinds of actions around heritage, like 'Erfgoeddag'.
I'll never let me lead through fear. As we say in Dutch: 'Angst is een slechte raadgever.' (fear is a bad counselor)
Kind regards,
Bert Anciaux
27 February 2009
Mr. Minister,
I have received your pathetic reply to my letter of January 27th. That you don’t agree with me is not surprising. You have your agenda to worry about and to please the politically correct crowd.
We would never concur in any case as I see the problems first hand at grassroots level every single day while you reside in cloud cuckoo land.
You are free to disagree with me as, for now at least, Belgium seems to still be paying lip service to this form of democracy.
Even so, apart from your dissent you never once touched on any of the questions and/or statements I put to you. Furthermore, it took you a month to construct this reply of a few lines to my original letter, while my friends who also wrote to you got theirs within a week. Maybe that was because they were more diplomatic in their approach while mine was straight to the point.
Unlike you I do know what I am talking about when I touched on the subject of our culture being overrun by this backward and anachronistic religion and its rules.
Of the thirty years I was away I have lived sixteen of those years in a predominantly Islamic neighborhood. Needless to say I didn’t have to try even 1% of the stuff the Muslims in Belgium are doing.
Try and build a church in an Islamic country, or just steal something, or try to have a friendship or relationship with a Moslima. Do I have to paint a picture?
I had returned but four days to this country when some of these so-called “disadvantaged youths” tried a violent approach with me. They outnumbered me 5 to 1. Two of those needed medical treatment afterwards.
My own mother was attacked, stabbed, and robbed by that scum. My nephew and niece beaten by a group of those peace-loving followers of the Koran. They operate in groups like the cowards they are.
Where do you live Mr. Minister? I just bet its far away from the ordinary people who live with similar problems every day.
When are you going to see that what you and your incompetent colleagues are saying, and what actually happens are two different things?
Of course getting things done at governmental level is like mating elephants; done at high level with lots of noise and taking years to produce results.
I have not the slightest respect for you and your colleagues who are selling their own people to safeguard their well-paid jobs.
An ordinary working person can’t afford to make one mistake or they are fired, yet the government piles on blunder after blunder without anyone so much as receiving a reprimand.
There are members of Islamic terrorist cells running around free. Bus drivers and their passengers are beaten nearly on a daily basis by “youths”. Serious criminals, foreign born, are roaming the streets without fear of arrest. People who are illegal immigrants protest on our streets freely without arrest. Tell me Mr. Minister, what part of “illegal” is it that you don’t understand? All they have to do is yell “Discrimination!” and you and those incompetents in our government piss their pants.
But let some poor countryman of mine exceed the speed limit by 5km per hour and the law will come down on them like a ton of bricks. You get less jail time here for killing someone than for exceeding the speed limit or to drive through a red traffic light.
Thousands of Islamic protesters are allowed to proceed and trash our cities, and not one arrest was made where the perpetrators were actually locked up. I seem to remember a handful of Flemings trying to organize a protest march against the Islamic influence in our society which was then clubbed apart by hastily called-up Walloon policemen calling them all sorts of vile names. Let me just state here that I do not belong to any political organization, nor have I ever. I am just making a comparison.
People who do not agree with your colleagues and yourself are dismissed as agitators while time and time again this nauseating policy of “multi-culturalism” is rammed down our throats.
Could I do better if I were in your shoes I hear you ask?. Damn right I can!
Unlike you and your cowardly colleagues I have been on the front line in the struggle against terrorism. Unlike you I have seen first hand what fundamentalists do to those they consider “Kafir” (unbelievers). Unlike you I paid my dues in blood, sweat, and tears.
You are not a leader, nor are your fellow ministers.
The lot of you couldn’t organize a piss-up in a brewery. I have no respect for you and that crowd. If you had been my commander in the field I wouldn’t wait for the enemy to take you out, I’d do it myself.
To quote Churchill: An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last.
Whatever happened to the people who once stood against Ceasar’s legions forcing him to admit that of all the Gallic tribes the Belgians were the most fierce? Am I not descended from those same people like Karel Martel who stopped the first Islamic invasion? Does the blood of Jan Breydel and Pieter de Coninck not stream through my veins? Yes it does! But apparently not through yours.
I will never give in to a foreign influence and most certainly not when ordered by Quislings like our government ministers. I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees.
Courage is rightly esteemed the first of human qualities which guarantees all others. (Quote).
Fanatics is what they are and will remain. Fanatics against anyone and anything that is not following their rules. We have become prisoners in our own homes as it is no longer safe to go out on the streets. Some sections of our cities are already no-go areas where even the police fear to go. And still you do nothing! Nothing but make absurd statements to get your mug into the newspapers. You go on deciding to be undecided. At least I know who I am and where I’m going. The same cannot be said of you. To our “leaders” I say in the immortal words of the Vietnam tunnel rats: Non gratum anus rodentum!
Good Day.
|
|
|
|
Tools 
Send a private message
Tell a friend
Add to My MSN
Add to your network
Sign up for alerts
